<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.0.11" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Organic foods</title>
	<link>http://blog.rajgad.com/life/health/2006-01/organic-foods.html</link>
	<description>Amit D. Chaudhary's blog on Life, Technology, Software Development, Information worth knowing and Spirituality</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 21:47:41 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0.11</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: Cent</title>
		<link>http://blog.rajgad.com/life/health/2006-01/organic-foods.html#comment-314</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Jan 2008 23:54:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blog.rajgad.com/life/health/2006-01/organic-foods.html#comment-314</guid>
					<description>"[H]ow neutral is QuackWatch? And how scientific is it really?"

Good question. While I have found Quackwatch helpful in pointing out some legitimate criticisms of many health-related concerns, there is no doubting it is heavy-handed, hyperbolic, and bitter all too often. Still, it can be helpful if this is taken into consideration. At the same time, I realize I haven't been to that site in recent years. Good observations. Thanks for the read.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;[H]ow neutral is QuackWatch? And how scientific is it really?&#8221;</p>
<p>Good question. While I have found Quackwatch helpful in pointing out some legitimate criticisms of many health-related concerns, there is no doubting it is heavy-handed, hyperbolic, and bitter all too often. Still, it can be helpful if this is taken into consideration. At the same time, I realize I haven&#8217;t been to that site in recent years. Good observations. Thanks for the read.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.240 seconds -->
